See how the number of I-9s you store and how they are managed can affect potential fines if violations are identified during an audit.
Even well-intentioned employers can develop I-9 gaps or process failures that significantly increase audit risk.
Missed completion or reverification deadlines
+
Maximus I-9 workflows prevent missed completion and reverification deadlines through automated tracking and alerts that keep required actions on schedule.
Acceptance of expired or incorrect documents
+
Maximus I-9 guidance aligns document selection with current USCIS requirements and flags expired or invalid documents before submission.
Inconsistent or noncompliant processes across departments
+
Maximus standardizes I-9 workflows across departments while supporting on-site, authorized representative, and remote completion models with centralized oversight.
Improper retention or premature purging of I-9 records
+
Maximus applies automated USCIS retention rules to ensure I-9 records are retained and purged correctly, with audit-ready documentation.
Limited oversight of third-party vendors
+
Maximus centralizes I-9 activity and reporting to maintain visibility and compliance across internal teams and authorized representatives.
Understand the operational, compliance, and audit risks tied to paper I-9s and why many employers move to electronic records.
See why employers go electronicGo beyond the estimate. Learn how I‑9 audits work, what mistakes can trigger fines, and how to prepare your records.
Access the I-9 audit guideThis calculator estimates potential I-9 fines based on the information you provide. It is designed to help employers understand how record volume and storage methods can influence financial risk if errors are identified during an audit.
To generate an estimate, the calculator considers:
The total number of active I-9 forms you store, including current employees and terminated employees that have not yet been purged
The percentage of those forms stored on paper versus electronically
The calculator models scenarios where violations are identified across a portion of records. Penalty ranges reflect federal I-9 violation thresholds and are not limited to minor technical errors. Actual fines can vary based on factors such as violation type and severity, whether errors are technical or substantive, compliance history, and circumstances identified during an inspection.
Results are directional, not definitive. Only a full compliance review can determine actual exposure.
I-9 audits often uncover issues like incomplete forms, missing signatures, late verification, improper storage, and retention errors. Even small error rates can result in significant fines when applied across a large workforce.
Strengthening documentation practices, retention processes, and audit readiness can meaningfully reduce risk, particularly for organizations that still rely on paper I-9s.